The recent retraction of a trial published in JAMA after a serious programming error highlights why sharing analytic code is important for transparency.
Why researchers should share their analytic code
- Authors:
Ben Goldacre
Caroline Morton
Nick DeVito - Posted:
21 November 2019
- Citation:
Goldacre, B., Morton, C. E., & DeVito, N. J. (2019). Why researchers should share their analytic code. BMJ, l6365. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6365
- Tags:
More in Open Working
Exploring automated output checking with OpenSAFELY
22 Sep, 2021
How we learnt to stop worrying and love web scraping
8 Sep, 2020
Bringing NHS data analysis into the 21st century
16 Jul, 2020View everything in Open Working →
More in Policy Insights
First Impressions of the EU CTIS Registry
31 Oct, 2022
Making TREs the default across the NHS: A first step
5 Oct, 2022
National Data Guardian report cites and reinforces Bennett Institute work on building public trust in use of data for research
12 Sep, 2022
Bennett Insights: An Overview of UK Data Policy Developments
27 Jul, 2022
Better, Broader, Safer Uses of Data Help Data Saves Lives
3 Jun, 2022
Goldacre Review outlines how to achieve better, broader, and safer use of health data for research and analysis
8 Apr, 2022
View everything in Policy Insights →
More in Research Integrity
First Impressions of the EU CTIS Registry
31 Oct, 2022How we learnt to stop worrying and love web scraping
8 Sep, 2020
